home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.onramp.net!usenet
- From: dcorn@1.1.1.16 (David Corn)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: What I want from new Workbench
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 01:41:24 GMT
- Organization: On-Ramp; Individual Internet Connections; Dallas/Ft Worth/Houston, TX USA
- Message-ID: <3148c763.42459378@1.1.1.16>
- References: <2477.6641T698T2915@actcom.co.il> <5Mqdy*47g@yaps.rhein.de>
- Reply-To: dcorn@paradise.pplnet.com
- NNTP-Posting-Host: modem5.pplnet.com
- X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.182
-
- On Sat, 09 Mar 1996 20:33:09 +0100, arno@yaps.rhein.de (Arno
- Eigenwillig) wrote:
-
- >In article <2477.6641T698T2915@actcom.co.il>, Ariel Magnum writes:
- >
- >> 9. Compiling the ROMs to varius CPU's.
- >
- >No! That would require a ROM update each time the CPU is updated. And
- >the benefit is neglectible: I estimate the amount of not time-critical
- >ROM code to be more than 95%. And in the rare cases where CPU-related
- >fine-tuning is advisable, automatic solutions (let the ROM code decide
- >by itself which version of a routine it wants to run or have some init
- >routine set it up accordingly) are superior. Such things already have
- >to be done for things like GetCC().
-
-
- Goodness! You sound like a PowerMac advocate. :)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-